See "Harvard Finds Psychology Researcher "Solely Responsible" for Scientific Misconduct" by Tom Bartlett, Chronicle of Higher Education, 8/20/2010.
Friday, August 20, 2010
Update on Harvard Misconduct case
A committee at Harvard University has found psychology faculty member Marc Hauser "solely responsible" for eight instances of scientific misconduct, including problems in three published and five unpublished studies of data acquisition, data analysis, data retention and the reporting of research methodologies and results.
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
In Harvard Lab Inquiry, a Raid and 3-Year Wait
Interesting article in the New Times discussing the career of well-known Harvard psychologist Dr. Marc Hauser and questions being raised about his research methods and the validity of some of his findings. Is this a question of an innovative scientist having research methods that differ from his colleagues and a few honest mistakes made, or a question of misconduct?
In Harvard Lab Inquiry, a Raid and 3-Year Wait by Nicole Wade
Monday, August 16, 2010
Peers nip misconduct in the bud
A relatively recent editorial in the July 22 edition of Nature reports the results of a survey looking at how scientists respond when they see instances of misconduct being performed by their colleagues. The results show that informal intervention where a researcher talks to his colleague in an non-adversarial way is often an effective way to change behavior, and respondents reported to have suffered little fallout from these interventions.
To read more, please see Peers Nip Misconduct in the Bud by Gerald Koocher and Patricia Keith-Spiegel
(A subscription to Nature is required to view the full article.)
Thursday, August 5, 2010
Fixing Peer Review
An editorial in the latest edition of The Scientist discusses five academic papers that ended up being published in less prestigious journals than they should have due to problems in the peer review system. These problems include that the peer review process discourages truly innovative ideas whole publishing status quo or "hot" fields of the day, and that it can take months or years to be able to spot and evaluate the importance of a paper and the impact it may have on its field.
For years, the peer review process has attracted criticism, and this paper aptly highlights five instances when peer review failed. The question is, what are some better alternatives to the process at it currently exists today?
The full article is available off The Scientist Web site. "Breakthroughs from the Second Tier"
Monday, July 26, 2010
Offshore Stem Cell Clinics Sell Hope, Not Science
This morning on NPR, reporter Richard Knox discussed how some overseas companies are offering stem cell treatments to customers over the web for spine injuries, heart disease, and many other conditions. However, for many of these conditions stem cell treatment is not the answer, and customers often spend thousands of dollars on stem-cell therapies with little benefit to themselves.
Read or listen to the full article here.
Should the national governments or other international regulatory organizations try and put a stop to this kind of false advertising, or this a case of buyer beware?
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Oil Debate Spills into Academe
Interesting article about some university faculty who initially volunteered to help BP with the oil spill cleanup, and the reasons many of them decided to back out after reading the fine print.
See full article here.
Monday, July 12, 2010
Coordinating Efforts and Ensuring Transparency for Relief Work in Haiti
In an Op-Ed in the New York Times, former U.S. President Bill Clinton and the current Haitian Prime Minister Jean-Max Bellerive discuss the efforts of the Interim Haiti Reconstruction Commission to coordinate rebuilding efforts and to meet needs of the Haitian people six months after the earthquake that hit the nation in January 2010. In disaster relief efforts of this kind, issues of transparency and collaboration are key as organizations try and make sure that funds and support get to those most in need, and that the hundreds of NGO's and other programs now in Haiti work together to provide sustainable solutions for the many communities affected by the earthquake.
Finishing Haiti's Unfinished Work, New York Times, July 9, 2010
Interim Haiti Reconstruction Commission Web site.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)